New Discoveries In Genetics Refute Evolution Theory
The War Over “Junk DNA”
[Editor's notes - There is a powerful worldwide atheist Darwin Conspiracy that suppresses the dissemination of any evidence that is anti-Darwin. The Darwin Conspiracy also distorts and manipulates data, and fabricates concepts, all to prevent the world from learning information that proves Darwin was wrong.
The phony concept of "junk DNA" is a good example of how the Darwin Conspiracy created a phony concept for the sole purpose of preventing us from learning human DNA is very different from ape DNA and therefore Darwin was wrong.]
Whenever there is a debate about evolution, the Darwinians always make the claim that “99% of the genetic matter of apes and humans is identical.”
That sounds pretty convincing but they never tell you that they are only referring to just 2% of the DNA and their comparison does not include the “junk DNA” that makes up 98% of the human chromosomes.
Darwinians have to exclude “junk DNA” from their DNA comparison because ape and human “junk DNA” are so different there isn't even a way to compare the two.
If you include all 100% of the DNA, and not just 2%, then ape and human DNA are so different that it is inconceivable for humans to have evolved from apes.
For this reason, the Darwinians pulled a fast one and created the phony concept of “junk DNA.” Darwinians labeled 98% of human DNA as “junk DNA” and claimed it was useless junk and should be ignored in any comparison of ape and human DNA.
The only way Darwinians could make the “99% identical” claim is by excluding “junk DNA.”
But what this means is if “junk DNA” is actually functional and active, you must include it in DNA comparisons and then “ape to human evolution” will be obliterated because ape and human “junk DNA” are too different for evolution theory to explain.
Guess what? The science of genetics has just recently proven that human “junk DNA” is not junk but instead essential.
In September, 2012, 30 scientific papers were published simultaneously by the US government funded ENCODE project. These peer reviewed papers provide ample proof that human “junk DNA” is at least 80% “functional” and “active.”
The Darwinians went ballistic. The science of genetics is refuting “ape to human evolution” and Darwinians are apoplectic.
“Ape to human evolution” theory is on its way towards extinction – it was not fit enough to survive the truth.
ALL THE DNA IN OUR CHROMOSOMES IS ESSENTIAL FOR LIFE
Although the general public associates DNA with genes, only 2% of human DNA are actually genes or “encoding DNA.”
The function of genes (encoding DNA) is to replicate proteins but genes are not on auto-pilot and they do not act by themselves. Something has to regulate the genes.
In humans, genes make up only 2% of our DNA and our genes are regulated by the other 98% of human DNA. Darwinians have labeled this 98% as “junk DNA.”
But this 98% of human DNA is not “junk DNA” and instead contain the actual blueprints for life and is the Master Genetic Controller that regulates gene activity.
The Master Genetic Controller regulates the activity of each gene, and controls when a gene produces a specific protein, how much to produce and for how long.
The following analogy will help us to understand how genes and the Master Genetic Controller work together:
Genes are like musical instruments of a philharmonic orchestra. Each musical instrument can make a particular set of musical sounds and each gene can make a particular set of proteins.
Just as each musical instrument needs a musician to play the instrument, each gene also needs the Master Genetic Controller to direct the gene to produce the right protein, at the right time, in the right amounts.
Musical instruments do not play Beethoven's Ninth by themselves. You need musicians to play each instrument plus each musician has to follow the correct sheet music and play the right notes at the right time.
Similarly, human genes do not create a fetus and a baby by themselves. The genes have to be regulated, controlled and coordinated with each other to produce the right protein, in the right amounts, at the right time and for the right duration of time.
Otherwise, you get chaos.
“Junk DNA” is not junk. The 98% of human DNA that Darwinians labeled “junk” is really the blueprint of human life, and the Master Genetic Controller.
Please click the link below and see a video of human embryonic development. When you watch the video, please think about how there must be a Master Genetic Controller that coordinates the activities of all the genes so that every cell divides at the right time, and each and every single cell turns into the right successor cell exactly when it is supposed to. There is no way that genes by themselves, a mere 2% of our DNA, can auto-pilot themselves into successfully creating an embryo. Especially since the genes contain only “encoding DNA” and can only replicate proteins.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgT5rUQ9EmQ
Below are some details about the origins of “junk DNA” and why “junk DNA” is really “vital DNA.”
THE SCIENCE OF GENETICS EXPOSES THE "99% IDENTICAL" CLAIM IS A LIE
The science of genetics has recently made major discoveries that refute “ape to human evolution” and prove Darwin was wrong – because of this, atheists are on the warpath and there is currently a huge battle being fought over whether there really is “junk DNA.”
The battle began in September, 2012, when the ENCODE project (a worldwide consortium of over 400 genetic researchers) simultaneously published 30 scientific papers that prove human “junk DNA” is not at all junk but is instead at least 80 per cent “functional” and essential to gene regulation and embryonic development.
Evolution scientists went ballistic. The geneticists seemed to have not realized that “junk DNA” is sacred to atheists because it is a cornerstone of Darwin Conspiracy lies.
Let us explain why:
For decades, atheists have claimed that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 99% identical.
But here is the secret – when atheists make the “99% identical” claim, they are only referring to "encoding DNA" which is a mere 2% of human DNA – they are not including the other 98% because they have labeled that as “junk DNA.” If you include “junk DNA,” then ape and human DNA are only 30% similar or identical.
The huge problem atheists are faced with is the fact that most parts of human “junk DNA” is not at all similar to ape “junk DNA.” Therefore, if “junk DNA” has function, then evolution theory is refuted because it simply cannot explain the vast differences between ape and human “junk DNA.” The differences are so great that it is impossible for humans to have evolved from apes, just as it is impossible to make a Ferrari from the parts of a Volkswagen.
For starters, to help you understand the basics of the ENCODE discoveries, please read the following Time Magazine article:
http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/06/junk-dna-not-so-useless-after-all/
So if “junk DNA” is really active and functional DNA, how come scientists have been so wrong and did not know this before?
The reason is the Darwin Conspiracy.
The Darwin Conspiracy fabricated the phony “junk DNA” idea in order to hide the fact that human DNA is very different from ape DNA. Atheists desperately need 98% of human DNA to be junk or else “ape to human evolution” gets demolished for reasons we will explain below.
The Origins of the Phony “Junk DNA” Concept
Advanced DNA testing techniques were not perfected until the 1970's, but scientists were able to conduct rudimentary DNA sequencing as early as the mid-1960's.
In the late 1960's, scientists had concluded a massive amount of DNA sequencing with the goal of comparing human DNA to ape DNA – they hoped to find a very high level of DNA similarities but instead they found enormous differences. They discovered that:
- 98% of the DNA of apes and humans is so different there was no way to even compare them – it was like trying to compare a 3-speed bicycle to a Harley motorcycle.
- Only about 2% of human DNA was very similar to ape DNA.
These two discoveries proved “ape to human evolution” was impossible because the DNA of apes and humans are so different that the discrepancies could not be accounted for by evolution. The DNA differences contradicted “ape to human evolution.”
This means that as early as the 1960's, DNA tests proved Darwin was wrong.
But you never learned about any of this because there is a very powerful worldwide Darwin Conspiracy that has successfully suppressed any scientific data that is anti-evolution.
The Darwin Conspiracy censors the publication of scientific data, fabricates phony ideas posing as scientific concepts, and also manipulates and distorts data for the sole purpose of promoting their beloved Darwinian Evolution Theory.
In 1972, the Darwin Conspiracy temporarily saved “ape to human evolution” theory from extinction by fabricating the phony concept of “junk DNA.”
Faced with the fact that 98% of ape DNA is vastly different from human DNA, the Darwin Conspiracy very cleverly decided to label that 98% of the DNA as “junk DNA” and therefore the ape to human DNA differences had no relevance.
The Darwin Conspiracy is insidious and very clever and always mixes truth with their lies so that their lies are more believable. The Darwin Conspiracy also normally wraps evolution-based theories around the fabrications and fake concepts to help disguise their lies.
So in 1972, Susumu Ohno, a Darwin Conspiracy leader, with the help of other atheist scientists, fabricated the phone concept of “junk DNA,” distorted the DNA results and presented them to the world in the following manner:
- 98% of the DNA of humans and apes is “junk DNA” and is inactive, useless junk and has no genetic significance and had no biological function.
- The remaining 2% of the DNA of humans and apes is the only DNA that is genetically significant because this 2% of human DNA is the only portion that actually encodes for proteins, and is the only part of our DNA that is active.
- The encoding DNA of apes and humans are almost “identical” and that is overwhelming evidence in support of the theory that humans evolved from apes. The fact only 2% of DNA is “encoding” is evidence in support of evolution.
Aren't the atheists clever?
By creating the baloney about “junk DNA,” the Darwin Conspiracy was able to successfully neutralize the fact that 98% of ape and human DNA are not similar and this kept the creationists from using those DNA differences as ammunition to attack “ape to human evolution.”
But there is one enormous problem with this “junk DNA” scam – since it is not true, sooner of later, indisputable scientific evidence will be discovered that refutes “junk DNA.”
Since the introduction of the “junk DNA” baloney, there have been literally hundreds of scientific papers that produced substantive evidence that “junk DNA” was not at all junk – most of these papers proved “junk DNA” included essential gene regulators.
But the Darwinians were always able to pooh-pooh or ignore these papers. The “junk DNA” scam remained dominant until September, 2012
In September of 2012, the hoax of “junk DNA” finally faced a serious challenge and at this very moment, Darwinians are losing the battle to keep “junk DNA” alive.
ENCODE Project Proves Junk DNA is not Junk
But Is Essential for Successful Embryonic Development
In 1970, DNA tests comparing human to ape chromosomes found that only about 2% of human DNA could be matched up to ape DNA – scientists had trouble finding ways to match up the remaining 98%. Essentially, this meant that ape and human DNA was 98% different and it meant that humans could not have evolved from apes.
All the scientists who did this research were atheists.
The atheist Darwin Conspiracy of scientists prevented the public from knowing about this fact and instead concocted the hoax of “junk DNA.” The Darwin Conspiracy claimed that the 98% of human and ape DNA that is unmatchable was “junk DNA” and therefore, the fact that they were different was meaningless.
The Darwin Conspiracy got away with this nonsense for four decades.
But then came September, 2012, when the universally respected ENCODE project simultaneously published 30 scientific research papers that proved that “junk DNA” is not junk at all but at least “80% functional.”
The ENCODE project has impeccable credentials – it is a worldwide consortium of over 400 geneticists. It is the successor to the Human Genome Project and is funded by the United States government through the NIH (National Institutes of Health, url is NIH.gov).
ENCODE conducted ten years of research on the human genome, and discovered that the so-called “junk DNA” was not useless but was instead “functional” and often essential – the so-called “junk DNA” was really the “essential DNA” that contains all the crucial regulators that control gene expression.
ENCODE discovered that at least 80% of “junk DNA” is "functional" and "active" and "junk DNA" contained the DNA necessary for embryonic development and contains the blueprint and tools required to create a baby.
Below are some links to help you learn more about the discoveries ENCODE made and the reactions to them:
- For an overall view of what the ENCODE project discovered, please read this article by Time Magazine:
http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/06/junk-dna-not-so-useless-after-all/
- And by the Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443589304577633560336453228.html
- If you are a scientist, you can sink your teeth into this Encode Research Paper published by Nature:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7414/full/nature11247.html
- This next link is to a Scientific American article so you can learn the atheist viewpoint about the ENCODE discoveries (Scientific American is a devout support of “ape to human evolution.”):
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=friction-over-function-encode
- Finally, the link below gives you an idea how some persons of faith are viewing the ENCODE discoveries:
http://egnorance.blogspot.com/2012/11/darwinist-larry-moran-encode-is-going.html
*****
The ENCODE project has already provided ample evidence that what atheists call “junk DNA” is actually “vital DNA” that regulates genes.
But the “vital DNA” of apes and humans is vastly different and this proves Darwin was wrong because:
- Only about 2% of human DNA is very similar to ape DNA.
- 98% of the DNA of apes and humans is so different there is no way to even compare the two DNA's – it would be like trying to compare a bicycle to a Ferrari. This means that humans could not have evolved from apes.
So the next time any Darwinian tells you “the genetic matter of apes and humans are 99% identical,” you know this is a Darwin Conspiracy lie.